Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

A Mathematical Analysis of Intravitreal Drug Transport

R Avtar, D Tandon

Department of Mathematics, Harcourt Butler Technological Institute, Kanpur 208002, India;

For correspondence:-  D Tandon   Email: deepti_hbti@yahoo.co.in

Published: 12 March 2008

Citation: Avtar R, Tandon D. A Mathematical Analysis of Intravitreal Drug Transport. Trop J Pharm Res 2008; 7(1):867-877 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v7i1.2

© 2008 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose:  The aim of our present work is the development of a quasi steady-state model for the distribution of intravitreally injected drugs and investigation of the effects of various model parameters on the drug distribution in normal and diseased eyes.
Method: A simple mathematical model for the intravitreal transport of drugs was developed using Fick’s law of diffusion, Darcy’s law of convective flow, and Michaelis –Menten kinetics of metabolism. A Crank-Nicolson finite difference scheme of the equation  describing the drug transport  in the vitreous body was written, in which the radial and axial diffusive terms and convective terms of the  equation were approximated by central differences, while the temporal terms were approximated by average of forward and backward time differences. A system of linear algebraic equations obtained from the Crank Nicolson finite difference scheme was solved by line Jacobi iterative scheme in which successive improved approximate results are obtained.
Result:  The model predicts that an increase in the metabolic (consumption) rate and drug release rate constant reduces the concentration of intravitreally injected drug at the centre of retina and along centreline of vitreous body. A significant increase in the drug concentration at the centre of retina and along the centreline of the vitreous body in  the eye afflicted with glaucoma and retinal detachment is observed and the decay rate of drug concentration in these pathological states is higher than that in the normal eyes.
Conclusion: The vitreous outflow as observed in the glaucomatous and/- or rhegmatogenous eyes may contribute to the transport of intravitreally injected drug in the vitreous body. The drug concentration in the vitreous body and at the centre of retina in such diseased eyes is higher than that in the normal eyes and the decay rate of drug concentration is significantly enhanced.

Keywords: Convective-diffusive transport, intravitreal injection, line-Jacobi iterative technique, release rate.

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates